How To Avoid THE Illusion Of Social Media Engagement

I recently attended a conference, where Claire Diaz Ortiz, who heads social innovation at Twitter, spoke about influence. She said something surprising. She said that two of the most engaged “brands” on Twitter had far fewer followers than the celebrities or giant brands with many millions of followers. Those brands were both Christian Ministries: Joel Osteen and Rick Warren. Today, with about 725,000 followers, a Joel Osteen tweet gets far more retweets than one from Lady Gaga, who has 26 million followers. The reason, Ortiz said, is shared values.

I imagine that many corporate social media documents list engagement as a goal. Whether it’s an individual initiative or an overall strategy, the word “engagement” has become the ultimate prize in the world of social media. Yet, gaming the system, creates only an illusion of engagement.

If your social media efforts strive to be helpful, inspiring, supportive, informative or fun and do so in a way that fits your brand and delivers value, you have a better chance of being engaged than if you goal is engagement.Try as you might to create massive amounts of engagement, it’s your mission—the meaning you bring to your community that determines genuine engagement. Joel Osteen has a mission—a higher calling. But you don’t need to be a ministry to have a mission.

Social media is the ultimate vehicle for spreading ideas and as Seth Godin says, “ideas that spread win.” Yet we see so many manipulative tactics being used to get people to like Facebook pages, to retweet updates on Twitter and to “engage” for reasons other than a desire to be part of something and spread the word. A mission to increase engagement is like a mission to make a viral video. Other people will decide if your video or your idea is worth spreading.

How do you increase your Facebook likes or get more retweets? If it involves giving people a secondary reason like the opportunity to win a prize or vote for a charity, the sharing is short term. A relationship based entirely on this type of motivation is fragile at best.

Consider three types of engagement:

Organic engagement

Organic engagement happens when people choose to like, share or comment on your Facebook status, share your tweets, or comment on your blog without prompting or reward. Because of your content or your product, they are moved, on their own to talk about and to you. They feelsomething about your product or your content that drives their behavior.

Encouraged engagement

Discovery sometimes needs a little help. People may not be aware of your Facebook presence or they may be standing on the sidelines and need some encouragement to participate. Encouraged engagement comes from promoting the fact that your content exists and making the “ask .” And, it should be accompanied with an explanation of what to expect from your social media account.

Encouraged engagement also includes asking for the “like” or the comment. It’s a gentle reminder that you want to have a conversation.

Incentivized (or Forced) engagement

Now we are getting into murkier territory. Almost everyone incentivizes engagement at some point. You run a contest to get people to interact on Facebook or Twitter. You offer a reward for sharing content. “Come by our booth and tweet about our product for a chance to win an iPad”

As a short term result, you’ll get more likes and more people talking about you on Facebook or more Tweets because you paid for it in some way. But it’s not sustainable. Forced engagement is not a long-term strategy. If people don’t ultimately connect organically, you will be caught in a never ending cycle of having to offer a reward. You don’t build trust and nobody really cares that much because as soon as a better offer comes along they will disappear.

So the next time you sit around the table hatching a plan to “increase engagement” ask three questions.

Is this engagement sustainable? Does it build trust? How will people feel (about you) when they are sharing? The answers to those questions will tell you whether you can expect engagement that adds value to your brand or the illusion of engagement.

Source: How To Avoid The Illusion of Social Media Engagement | Social Media Explorer

Is Facebook Testing a ‘Want’ Button?

Facebook may be testing a “Want” button that would allow you to add products to a virtual wish list.

According to Tom Waddington, a web developer for the site Cut Out + Keep, Facebook has a disabled “Want” button included in the Javascript coding its list of social plug-ins. This means that — in addition to existing plug-ins such as subscribe and the Like button that allow users to see friend activity across the site — a “Want” button would likely allow members to see what items others in their network want to purchase.

“The code was released to the Facebook Javascript SDK on Wednesday,” Waddington told Mashable. “I keep track of the changes to the file.”

Waddington said he discovered a few other new tags — such as “degrees,” “page events,” “social context” and “privacy selector” — but they don’t seem to be working as well: “I’m still exploring the code to see what else is new.”

Although the button is currently not listed on Facebook’s developer site as a social plugin, Waddington said that the Want button would only work on Open Graph projects with under the tag “products.”

Waddington tried to install the Want button onto his blog, but received an error message in the process.

“The button displays on the site, but clicking it shows an error message,” Waddington said. “Facebook hasn’t enabled any apps to publish Wants yet.”

Facebook hasn’t yet responded to a request for comment. Waddington’s discovery was first noted by Inside Facebook on Thursday.

The Want app would allow the company to collect a lot of information about member interests, just as the Like button already does. The move would also allow merchants greater integration with Facebook without having to build their own apps or platforms.

“E-commerce sites could increase social exposure by including a Want button,” Waddington said. “It will not require authorizing an app and will publish a “user wants product’ story in the news feed.”

He added that apps users authorize will likely be able to access the “wanted” products through the API, so Facebook could provide a universal wish list.

“If Facebook allows sites to include prices and product data such as ISBN numbers, then it will become really powerful,” he added.

Would you be interested in seeing a Want button on the site? How do you think it could impact the retail industry? Let us know in the comments.

Microsoft Surface to Be Wi-Fi-Only at First

The initial version of Microsoft Surface will only work with Wi-Fi and not with mobile phone networks according to a report.

Citing “two people familiar with the matter,” Bloomberg reports that Microsoft is equipping the phone with a short-range Wi-Fi connection. Microsoft could not be reached for comment on the report.

Microsoft introduced Surface, its latest tablet, on Monday. The company has been guarded about details for the product, withholding its release date and pricing. Details about connectivity has also been scant, but offering a Wi-Fi-only device would put Surface at a disadvantage against the iPad, whose latest iteration connects to LTE networks. However, Apple also sells a Wi-Fi-only device and not offering mobile network connectivity may be a way for Microsoft to keep costs down.

What do you think? Does mobile connectivity matter? Let us know in the comments.